Before you apply
You are near the Partner Program bar and want to know what a reviewer will see. Run the audit and the script check now, while fixing is free.
What reviewers actually checkYouTube monetization · Reused content
YouTube's rejection email is two vague sentences. This free checker is the other side of it: answer plain questions about your channel, and see exactly which published YouTube rules your answers trip — reused content and inauthentic content, kept separate, with your real appeal deadlines counted for you.
Four checks, each built from what YouTube itself publishes. Work through the ones that match your situation — before you apply, after a rejection, or while an appeal clock is running.
Answer for your channel as it stands today — not as you plan to fix it. Each question comes from YouTube's published allowed and not-allowed lists. The two policies are kept in separate sections because they are separate rules with separate fixes.
Faceless and narration channels live or die on their scripts. Paste the script you are about to record, plus up to five earlier ones, and see how much of the new script repeats your own earlier words — the same hooks, the same passages, the same opening and closing lines.
Appeals run on clocks YouTube publishes and its emails barely mention. Pick what happened and the date on YouTube's email — your dates print below.
YouTube publishes an exact spec for a video appeal. You get one appeal — check every box honestly before you spend it.
What this checker cannot do. It cannot give you YouTube's verdict, and neither can anyone else. YouTube decides in a human review of your whole channel — your most-viewed videos, your newest videos, where your watch time comes from, your titles, thumbnails, descriptions, and your About section. What a checker can honestly do is hold your channel up against the rules YouTube publishes, count what trips them, and count your deadlines. Tools that promise to tell you whether you "will be monetized" are selling a guess in a verdict's clothing.
The paid kit
The checker shows you what is tripping the rules. The kit is the repair work: the fix playbooks for both policies, three complete appeal scripts written to YouTube's spec, the filming walkthrough, and the day-by-day plan for the 30 or 90 days after a rejection.
$39 one-time payment
You are near the Partner Program bar and want to know what a reviewer will see. Run the audit and the script check now, while fixing is free.
What reviewers actually checkThe email says "reused content" and almost nothing else. Your appeal clock — 21 days — is already running. Count it, then fix in the right order.
Rejected? What to do nextThe wait is now 90 days, and re-applying with the same channel gets the same answer. The work is changing what reviewers will see next time.
How to fix reused contentNo — and be careful with any tool that says it can. YouTube decides in a human review of your whole channel, and it publishes no score or pass mark. What a checker can do is measure your channel against the practices YouTube names in its own policy pages, so you can fix what is fixable before a reviewer sees it. That is what this checker does.
YouTube's definition: channels that repurpose content already on YouTube or another online source without adding significant original commentary, substantive modifications, or educational or entertainment value. It applies even if you have permission from the original creator, and it is separate from copyright.
They are two different policies. Reused content is about other people's material. Inauthentic content — the policy YouTube renamed from 'repetitious content' on July 15, 2025 — is about your own material being mass-produced and interchangeable: the same template, structure, and format with the topic swapped. Channels get rejected under either one, and the fixes are different.
21 days from the rejection or suspension, and you get one appeal. YouTube says appeal decisions usually arrive within about 14 days. If you do not appeal, a first rejection lets you re-apply after 30 days; after a failed appeal or a repeat rejection, the wait is 90 days.
An AI voice by itself is not banned. The risk is the full pattern reviewers call inauthentic: an AI voice reading similar scripts over similar stock footage, in the same structure, video after video. Original scripts, real variation between videos, and your own creative work in the edit are a different case from a template machine.
Never. Everything on this page runs in your browser. Nothing you type or paste is sent anywhere, stored, or uploaded — there is no login and no channel access. Services that ask for manager access to your channel are asking for something no checker needs.